The words are appropriate, and you should play this on BLAST, but the video is actually pretty funny to watch!
Now, let's move on from John Paulus and his craziness! and in doing so (and I hope you don't mind Perc) let me (Zyban) introduce this other video dedicated to the one and only FAIKEN who's the REAL subject on this blog.
Saturday, March 3, 2007
This Song is Dedicated to John Paulus
E-mails John Paulus sent to me on March 1st.
A few hours before he recanted his story about having sex with Clay Aiken.
Here they are for those who missed them. Nothing prompted John to start this new e-mail exchange. There was no communication from me before he sent these. They are in order top to bottom before I blocked him from being able to e-mail me.
John's words are in red, mine are in blue.
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 7:50 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
Looks like you really screwed up. I anticipated that it wouldn't be long before you would post my emails. Do you honestly think I would have told you anything of significance? HA! I do have to get something off my chest, however. I wasn't the one who sent those pics to Perez- I lied to you. I DO know who sent them though. ;-) Ask your board members and maybe she'll stand up. How much longer do you expect your blog to be around since you showed yourself to be, well... ROTFLMAO (always enjoying getting the last laugh).John
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 9:31 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
Cover my behind? I'm a gay man- that's not one of the area's I keep covered. You are really foolish and desperate if you think that I am covering ANYTHING. You just harmed Clay a whole lot and you have no idea what you just did. Dumb and selfish move on your part.
Oh, John, John.I didn't screw up. You'll do anything to cover your behind. You're a fraud and as long as you are happy being one, good luck to you.>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:26 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
You ARE responsible and that IS a fact.
T S
John, please stop e-mailing me. I no longer wish to communicate with you. I choose to communicate with honest, respectful people. I am not repsonsible for Clay's mental health no matter how you may try to spin it. Your 11 month long campaign might have quite a bit to do with Clay's distress if he is indeed in a crisis. Don't you dare try to deflect it on me.Now again, please do not e-mail me again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:38 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
Harassment? Please, You are all about harassment. You twisted everything I told you. You know darn well, that I care for Clay's well-being. You are a sick sick person.
T S
I asked you once to not e-mail me anymore. Now I'm asking again. If you continue, I will consider it harassment
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:46 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
You don't control me. What part don't YOU understand.
T S
What part of DO NOT E-MAIL me anymore don't you understand. Now, STOP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From :
John Paulus
Sent :
Thursday, March 1, 2007 10:56 PM
To :
T S
Subject :
Re: No Subject
I'm not harassing you. You harassed me and my mother by posting those emails. She's been getting calls to her house from Claymates calling her a whore and telling her she should have aborted me. You, my dear, just don't think. What you did was selfish and for NO reason. NO reason whatsoever.
T S
I don't want to control you. You can't even control yourself. Are you saying it is your intention to continue to harass me with your e-mails even when I've told you to stop? You are a sick little man and I will take steps to make sure you can't contact me. Now give it a rest.
Friday, March 2, 2007
Open letter to Clay Aiken: Idol or Idle
Clay, I think you are a piece of shit for sitting idly by while a deranged segment of your fans stalks anyone who says a negative word about you. What the heck are you thinking? Are you so stoked by the attention you are getting from these mentally ill fans, that you don't even have the decency to call them on the carpet for their conduct? How can you live with yourself knowing that your fans attack the fans of someone you supposedly have a friendship with? They even attack people for liking you less then before or saying that they dislike your new haircut. Do you find this sort of scary behavior funny? These people are doing this in your name and claiming to have the approval of your mother to stalk these people. Do you realize that?
I understand that you are not directly responsible for the actions of strangers but you could easily "call off the dogs" in one blog post. Your rabid fans look up to you and they follow your example. They think you are condoning their actions by your silence. Be direct and tell them to knock it off before someone gets seriously hurt and killed. If not, then it will be on your conscience when someone takes the law into their own hands to either defend you or defend their family against your lunatic fans. You really ought to get your head out your ass and take some kind of step to exculpate yourself from this mess before it's too late.
I understand that you are not directly responsible for the actions of strangers but you could easily "call off the dogs" in one blog post. Your rabid fans look up to you and they follow your example. They think you are condoning their actions by your silence. Be direct and tell them to knock it off before someone gets seriously hurt and killed. If not, then it will be on your conscience when someone takes the law into their own hands to either defend you or defend their family against your lunatic fans. You really ought to get your head out your ass and take some kind of step to exculpate yourself from this mess before it's too late.
A Nutjob in a Nutshell
Here's what I think happened in a nutshell.
JP and CA hooked up. JP turned stalker and led his campaign for an apology for months on end. If anyone believes he was acting on behalf of anyone else, that's just silly.
John was obsessed with Clay Aiken and getting an apology. John got the apology and became obsessed then, (abused woman syndrome) with becoming close to Clay. Wanting to earn the love and trust of the person who rejected him. He probably did have some communications with Clay because Clay wanted to shove a pacifier in JP's mouth and keep him quiet.
Meanwhile, JP acts like a jealous lover and bashes Clay in e-mails, talks all kinds of shit whenever Clay doesn't pay enough attention to him and generally is a hypocrite. All is well (pardon the pun) when Clay is paying attention to John. When Clay does not communicate with John or DARES to hook up with another man, even though he is single and free to do so, John gets pissed and starts e-mailing shit about Clay.
I publish the e-mails and all the bad things that John had to say about Clay are now exposed and Clay has probably seen them and no longer wants anything to do with John. John was freaking last night in the e-mails he sent to me until I blocked them. You can all read them in the previous blog posts from yesterday if you haven't read them already. He tried to accuse me of causing Clay to almost have a breakdown and I was not accepting responsibility. A few hours later, John completely loses his mind and comes up with his pathetic story about how it was all a lie. If it's all a lie, why is Clay having a breakdown about the revelations like John was telling me a few hours earlier?
John freaked the fuck out. Now he is trying desperately to get himself back into Clay's good graces by concocting this bullshit story about how they never met, thinking this sacrifice of his will get Clay's attention and get Clay to believe that John has "atoned".
In the end, none of it makes any difference. There are plenty of other accounts besides the "almighty" John Paulus's of Clays sexual preference. And that's just a small part of the problem most people on this blog have with Clay. It's the overall fraud and the way he treats people like shit. It's a pattern he's had for his whole life, it's probably never going to change unless Clay hit's bottom.
And there's what I think in a nutshell.
http://www.perezhilton.com/topics/clay_aiken/caption_me_dont_look_at_his_face_20060506.php
Thursday, March 1, 2007
Clay Aiken: It's Been A Month Now. What's Up? NOT for KIDS!
Well, Clay, it's been a month since you issued your challenge. Remember? Here it is again.
It seems over the past few weeks, the tabloids and gossip mongers have had their hands full coming up with new and exciting "scandals" for me to be a part of. Yet, for all of their efforts to be on the "cutting edge" and the forefront of bull$#@& journalism, it seems that some of them may be running out of ideas and resorting to recycling and re-hashing some of their older tall tales. How sad!?
With this in mind, we thought maybe we would try to give them a finger.... er.. a hand.
For all of the contests that we hold here on the OFC, this one promises to be one of my favorites.Build-Your-Own-Scandal!That's right! Let's show off the creative abilities of the greatest group of fans on Earth.
The contest is simple, but will require some thinking and planning...
Come up with the most outlandish story you can that places me (either alone or with others close to me) in a really juicy/tawdry/scandalous/shameful story.
Then, use any photos, videos, audio clips of me that you can find along with your favorite multimedia enhancing/"doctoring" program (like a PhotoShop or a sound/video editor) to create your "evidence"!
Maybe you have "pictures" of me being "abducted by oversized turnips"... or ... "video" of me "dancing with a three legged gorilla".
Be creative!
You'll submit your "story" and "evidence" to an address that you'll find online here at the OFC very soon.
I'll personally pick the "story" that not only is most creative, but has the most CONVINCING and REALISTIC looking "evidence"!
(It obviously can't be that hard to come up with!)
The winner(s) will be featured here... PLUS... there will be a great prize to go along with the honor of being the creator of "Scandal 2007"
This one is gonna be fun!!Feel free to get started thinking...but, keep your eye out for details on rules/requirements for entry and deadlines and prizes. they be announced here soon.
Happy Fabricating!!
c
Current Mood: Excited
So, Clay? What happened? If it was all a joke, you should have told your OFC so that "greatest group of fans on earth" would not have wasted their time and effort to be in your contest and maybe win the grand prize!
It's been a month. Hasn't "soon" passed? Shouldn't there be some kind of announcement to let your OFC know what is going on? Is there a contest? Isn't there a contest? What happened?
At any rate, there are some pictures above. The first one is of you on GMA a couple of hours after you issued your middle of the night call to arms. Not looking too good there, buddy. Was it a rough night?
Below that, are some pictures that it looks like will never be able to be submitted anywhere for your consideration.
It's RUDE Clay. You advertised a contest on your OFC where people PAY to join and take part in exclusive contests. You owe them an answer or an explanation. Blog, or something. Really.
Clay Aiken Fans Behaving Like Trained Seals
Clay gives them the motion to shut up and they do. Someone else motions them to applaud and they do. It's....just.....sad.....AND FUNNY!!
What's Ahead For Clay Aiken? Some Suggestions!
If Clay Aiken's career doesn't start picking up SOON, he may soon find himself as your "friendly" neighborhood trash collector!
What other ideas do you have?
Wednesday, February 28, 2007
John Paulus's Emails:February
Subject:
Re: Clay
Date:
2/1/2007 4:46:12 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
You may be right.
.com wrote:
John,
Considering what the topic of Clay's newest blog is, I find what happened at 411 blog the other night too coincidental. I think Clay tried to play us ALL.
_______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Clay's newest blog
Date:
2/1/2007 4:47:59 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
He specifically mentions the "past two weeks". He's very careful not to call or imply I am a liar.
.com wrote:
Hi John,
What do you make of it? I think he is SUCH an asshole, calling on his mommies to fight the battles for him. Why doesn't he be a man and address rumors himself? Is he calling YOUR story bullshit, too? Did you see him on GMA? He looks exactly like he did in the firt set of webcam shots Perez posted this week.
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Clay's newest blog
Date:
2/1/2007 6:07:09 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Clay was on Manhunt late and I think that the blog thing was made up as a way to deter any questions that may have arised at GMA.You stay up late and don't sleep with you do crystal meth... so, I'm just wondering.
.com wrote:
John, I know you are the better man and that you give Clay the benefit of the doubt, but many people think that this line in his blog refers to you.
resorting to recycling and re-hashing some of their older tall tales.
I think his blog took the OFC by surprise as they haven't acknowledged Clay's contest, but have started another valentines day contest.
I think Clay is out of control. We know he's a pathological liar. You are someone who chooses to try to see the good in people and I'm very much the same way, but I would not trust a thing he tells you if I were you. I think he had a hand in what went down at the 411 blog and included you in the activities. I'd still love to know where that NAA person got that web-cam shot. Someone must have supllied it to them.
The blog Clay posted sounds like he was up all night. You don't wake up at 2:45 in the morning when you have to be at GMA in a few hours in the mood Clay was in to write that blog. And he looked like shit. Bags under the eyes and all.
I hope I don't sound like I'm giving you advice, because I know you don't need it. I think you know by now that I think very highly with you and I don't want to see anyone, especially the likes of Clay, mistreat you or mistake your kindness for weakness. It takes a very strong person to stay kind in this world. That is something I don't think Clay can fathom.
_________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/1/2007 7:36:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Please, just between us, it was he who posted it.
.com wrote:
This was just posted at 411
I don't know if this is posted yet, but now at the OFC some are questioning if this was not Clay and maybe it was a hacker. A mod e-mailed the admin to find out.Someone said one of the fans at GMA said something to him about the blog, and he acted as if he hadn't a clue what she was talking about.Anonymous 02.01.07 - 6:15 pm #
So at GMA, when questioned about the blog, Clay acted like he knew nothing about it and now the OFC is looking in to the possibility of a "hacker" posting that blog. He is OUT of control. Steer clear.
__________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/1/2007 8:19:13 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Yes it was him.
.com wrote:
It WAS him who posted the blog? Was he high or drunk or is he serious about this contest?
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/1/2007 8:35:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Personally, his blog came across as someone who had lost their mind and went over the edge. He's been advised by RCA executives and his attorney's to stay off the webcam and those sex sites so I am sure he got an earful when he arrived in NYC and this was his way of lashing out.
.com wrote:
John, is he serious about his blog? The fans think he's called them all to battle or something. Is he out of his mind?
________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/1/2007 9:04:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I am conflicted about the NAA thing. The more I think about it, the more inclined I am to believe that it wasn't him. NAA contacted me and begged me not to send Clay the copies of the IM transcript or the webcam. If it was Clay himself or had he had something to do with it NAA wouldn't have been so uptight.I not sure if he is going to follow through with the contest. I didn't go into too much. I know he IMed me to apologize for some of the comments that the fans wrote on various blogs. He said in was an "unintended consequence". I don't know if I buy that, but it may be true since I think he has lost his mind.
.com wrote:
Does he intend to follow through with his contest? The Claymates seem to have taken the attitude that they, like Clay, will give the "finger" to all those who they perceive as being untruthful. They are all about "fighting back" like Clay is. I thought he was trying to break away from his freaky fans and now they are only incited.
I've long felt that Clay should have said something to his fans to get them to back away from the craziness and now he's lit a fire under them.
Is there something bigger that's going to come out about him and he's looking to cast doubt on it by calling this contest?
Do you believe he had a hand in the NAA scam at 411 blog?
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/1/2007 9:26:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
You should put that in the comment section of your blog. I bet Clay would find that hilarious as well. You'd be a winner for sure. Two tickets to room 207 at the Quality Inn.
.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/1/2007 9:24:14 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jonahcruise@yahoo.com writes:
OMG!!! This is funny. Someone suggested that the Tabloid Scandal for 2007 should be webcam pictures of Clay Aiken with a women!!! ROTFLMAO
Ok...THAT"S hilarious!!! LMAO!!
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:26:27 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I would be very surprised if he proceeds with that stupid scandal contest. I'm sure his lawyers and RCA got a hold of him and said WTF were you thinking. I will admit to you that I did tell him that I thought he did cross the line with that blog and I didn't appreciate it. I also told him that just because I am civil with him does not mean that I will allow him to paint me or apply that I am a liar. If that is the case I told him that I would, without hesitation, file a suit against him. I think that may have shook him up some. I am more convinced that his little head is the one that does all the thinking for him. Off to the gym.John
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 7:20:07 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Oh, you can bet I don't trust him. Not as far as I could through him and despite my prolific weight training, that wouldn't be very far at all. I believe about 15% that comes from his mouth and that's no exaggeration whatsoever. Listen, I get to talk or chat with him often. I know him VERY well and I know many of his friends. We all know that he's a habitual liar- and NOT very good. For this very reason alone, I imagine many in the entertainment industry don't want to bother or have anything to do with him. The man is a mess and he is doing it to himself.
.com wrote:
Hi John,
I'm glad you gave Clay a talking to. I believe Clay was either high or out of his mind when he made that blog. All his nutcase fans feel like Clay has called them to battle. Unreal. Please be careful with Clay. I've had experience in my life with both drug users and people with mental illness who wouldn't get help and I've learned that you can trust neither.
If I were you, I wouldn't trust Clay at all right now. Don't confide in him. If he's out of sorts enough to fuck with his official fan club, I don't think there is anyone who he wouldn't hurt. Hell, he's even at the point where he is hurting himself and he doesn't seem to care. Clay has the money to get the best possible help for himself but he refuses to, and if he doesn't, he's going to go down in flames and he'll deserve to. Don't let him take you with him.
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 8:42:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
\.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Well, I know Clay a lot better than he thinks I do. He thinks I am gullible, that I have no doubt. I just want to tell you a quick story. There's this guy that's been wanting to go out with me for about 18 months, but he lives in Chapel Hill which is nearly an hour from me so I have been reluctant. He's very very attractive and athletic, any way, he was telling me that Clay started to chat with him online and that they went out to lunch. He made it clear at lunch to Clay that there wouldn't be anything sexual whatsoever between them. He hasn't heard from Clay since. However, Clay has been seeing his friend on a regular basis. I'm telling you, Clay has got to be the biggest whore in the Raleigh area. Without a doubt. Oh, and just for a bit more of information. Both guys are TOPS! Could it be that Clay is now a bottom? Maybe his belly sticks out more than his d**k does and he can't use it anymore. lol
.com wrote:
LOL! John, you sure have Clay's number! I love it!! See, Clay is convinced that there's nobody smarter than he is. But you and I both know that YOU are! I hope he keeps running his mouth to you and you sit back and laugh because you know you've got him! LOL
____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 8:58:51 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
No, he has no idea that I know about him going to lunch with this guy or that I know of the guy that's been topping him on a regular occassion. There are a lot of guys that I know that Clay's been with. One day when he pulls some crap with me and tries to feed me one of his lies like; I've learned my lesson and I'm not hooking up anymore, then I'll ask- does that include so and so who had you screaming and reaching for your pillow and Kristy was sleeping upstairs in her room. lol I've already shocked him with a half a dozen guys names he's been with that no one has even heard about. Perhaps, this is why he talks to me- afraid that I'll reveal even more about him. I can tell you right now that Matt Clemens and my knowledge about the whole episode really worried him. He told me that himself. He said that if people found out he cut his concert off early and held up the tour bus to meet with Matt one last time, it could ruin him. That is what forced him to say "uncle" and apologize. Not that it was meaningful, but at least I got him to give in. Something I am sure very few people have been able to do.
.com wrote:
Does Clay know you were considering dating the guy from Chapel Hill? If so, that is a nasty betrayal! I'd LMAO if you ever hit it off with John Dahlstrom! Clay IS a whore in ALL aspects of his life.
________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 9:22:49 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Oh, if you only knew how many times I sit back and laugh at him as he tries to BS me and I let him think that I believe him. Then once he's in so deep, I throw in something like this; well if that's the case and you've learned not to cheat then why did you try to hook up with Brandon while in Maryland on your tour. By the point, I normally get- "I've got to go. Talk to you later." Yes, with Clay's blog the focus of rebuttal should not have been to argue the point of whether or not he was dismissing the tabloid or Perez's claims, but how he's encouranging the youths on his sight to write about sex and how that is so not role model like. See this is something that the rabid mates would have much more difficulty arguing with and it will have thrown it back into Clay's face and caused his little blog to have backfired. He wants people to debate the truthfullness of the webcams, but he would never imagine that the debate would have been his encourgement of "sex stories" staring Clay Aiken and then rewarding perhaps a 13 year old fan for it. I think you really should consider writing a blog about that aspect of it and use a picture of Clay with children with a headline, Clay encourages his fans to write a sex scandal staring him.
________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 9:33:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Yes, the guest blogger did make some very good points.When you write the blog, please don't mention that I gave you any encouragement. I know that Clay is a regular reader of your blog and he would definitely cut off further contact with me. I want him to be able to trust me enough to at least listen to some constructive advice.
.com wrote:
John, that is an EXCELLENT idea and it will be the blog I write tomorrow. I just wanted to get the guest blogger on tonight because they make some VERY good points.
I'm going to do the blog that you suggested tomorrow because these words in particular bother me when there are children participating:
Come up with the most outlandish story you can that places me (either alone or with others close to me) in a really juicy, tawdry, scandalous, shameful story.Then, use any photos, videos, audio clips of me that you can find along with your favorite multimedia enhancing/"doctoring" program (like a PhotoShop or a sound/video editor) to create your "evidence"!
Clay is a sick fuck and he needs to be stopped.
____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 10:00:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Wow! There is so many comments about Clay encouraging children to write about juicy and tawdry stories. Yes, I think you guys are are the right path now and how to respond to his blog. Trust me, he will never have thought that his blog could have been twisted in this manner. This WILL worry him. I have no doubt about it.
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 10:09:48 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Well I appreciate it. I don't want you to ever think that I have compromised my principles or morals in exchange for keeping company with Clay. That is NOT the case. I have to be very careful and walk a fine line if I want to be able to get information from him and yet at the same time help him. He is really a very conflicted person with many issues. I have to tell you quite honestly that he is not as intelligent as people believe him to be and he is very flakey.
.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/3/2007 9:33:28 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jonahcruise@yahoo.com writes:
Yes, the guest blogger did make some very good points.When you write the blog, please don't mention that I gave you any encouragement. I know that Clay is a regular reader of your blog and he would definitely cut off further contact with me. I want him to be able to trust me enough to at least listen to some constructive advice.
John, I will never mention you. I PROMISE. If you noticed, someone on the blog asked me the other day if I had heard from you or anything about you and I said "no I haven't" even though we were e-mailing.
I don't consider you just a source and I have never, and will never publish anything you tell me on the blog unless YOU specifically tell me it's ok to and say it's from an anonymous source. I consider you a very good, honest man. A man with morals and courage. You are the OPPOSITE of Clay and I will not sell you out.
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 10:19:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
The SOB just blocked me on Manhunt. He's on there now trolling. No worries. I have other guys who've been watching out for him and waiting for him to invite them to webcam. Don't tell anyone that he is on now, because I just sent him an IM and text message chewing his fat a@@ out. He has yet to respond.
____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 10:34:35 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
This will really blindside him. He's so stupid. He thinks he's so smart, but he's playing with much smarter people than he. I'm telling you he and his friends will not like your blog tomorrow. I LOVE IT!!!
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:01:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
COM
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
How did you get that email and IP address?
COM wrote:
This was just posted on the blog, and I went to halo scan to check it out. Note the e-mail addy.
Is this someone you know as being connected to Clay? I'll include the IP and the post they made.
Name: Anonymous
IP: 69.226.232.19
e-mail: claiken@sbcglobal.net
You know I love the second blog and I hope that one day SOON Clay WILL release a statement similiar to that.
You need to know however, that at this time, he CANNOT say anything. He will however, say something, when he can.
I haven't posted here before, but I know this is true. It's not that he doesn't want to right now, he's in a position in which he absolutely can't.
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:09:24 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Maybe Clay. Is the poster in California? That's where the a@@hole is this week.
.com wrote:
From haloscan. Do you know who that person is? They are posting on the blog now.
_______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:12:06 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
It's probably him then. What else is he posting?
.com wrote:
Yes John, it's coming up as a location near San Jose.
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:40:52 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Hey what was this about? Keep me updated please.Perc, can I please have your email address?Anonymous 02.03.07 - 11:42 pm #
.com wrote:
Come and read. Dramamine, the other posters and I are kicking his ass if it is him.
___________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out.
Date:
2/3/2007 11:51:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I can't be for certain. If it is not him then it is the person who used to post on my blog as "A Friend".
com wrote:
Haven't heard anything yet. This IS Clay we are dealing with, isn't it?
__________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:00:37 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
I would remove the email address. This will encourage the person to share more if they know they can trust you. It will be worth it for you to do so.
.com wrote:
Fuck them. I'm not taking it down. It's Clay or someone he's with. According to the poster on the blog, he is also logged in to manhunt right now. Do you want to send this blog to Perez?
From :
Sue McFarlane
Sent :
Saturday, February 3, 2007 11:44 PM
To :
per-co-cet@hotmail.com
Subject :
Please remove my email address
Inbox
I'm asking you to please remove my email address from your blog. I DID NOT do anything tonight that was mean, nasty or wrong on your blog. I'm not into things like that. I will tell you that I AM friends with Clay and what I said is true. Please remove my email address.I am not Clay. Thanks.
_______________________________________________________________
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:09:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
No, it isn't, but it is someone close to him.
.com wrote:
Is that Clay?
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:16:25 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
Oh, I definitely know who this is. It's one of my sources. She will be disowned if Clay finds out she shared what she did.
.com wrote:
In a message dated 2/4/2007 12:09:31 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, jonahcruise@yahoo.com writes:
No, it isn't, but it is someone close to him.
Why are they pretending to be Sue McFarland or whoever. Do you know who this is? They outed Clay. They said it was as "first hand" as you can get.
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:19:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
_______________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:30:32 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
com wrote:
which e-mail john?
________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:48:30 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Well, it's your blog and it's up to you what you do.
com wrote:
I'm waiting for a reply from this person. There has been too much bullshit pulled by people on the blog lately as you are well aware.
_______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 1:06:34 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
She would like her name and email removed. This is one of the people that Clay has confided in and did admit to back in June that he and I did meet and that the events as I had written did occur. She is one of the few people who, while defending him publicly, really tells him like it is privately. She is one of the people that I told you about that only believes about 15% of what he says. I will give you some insider information. Clay's contract ends with RCA in the Spring and as of now he is not being signed by anyone.
.com wrote:
She's not responding to my e-mails anymore. Does she just want her name and the e-mail addy taken down? I'm not going to delete half the blog, or I lose credibility. You know how it is when you are running a blog. At some point soon, will you explain to me who this person is and what they are trying to do?
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 1:33:13 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
No it is not kiss or no kiss.
__________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 1:34:03 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
How about you post it tomorrow. Can you delete her info?
.com wrote:
John, can I post the info about RCA as coming from an anonymous source when if/when I delete her info or would that be bad for you?
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: John, Check this out. This is the e-mail I received.
Date:
2/4/2007 2:12:03 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Thank you.
.com wrote:
I'll deleted the info but not the posts. She said that was ok with her.
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:36:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
What are you thinking by posting those emails exchanges? This will not be a good thing.
___________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:37:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I pray that you will NEVER post my emails with you.
______________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/4/2007 12:42:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
Well, I have concern for her. She has two young boys and aside from my sincere concern for them. She was one of the people who provided me with valuable and reliable information on Clay. That source will now be shut out. Sometimes you have to look at the greater benefit and ignore some of the name calling. I hope that makes sense.
.com wrote:
I absolutely will not, John. But this person called me an asshole and was very disrespectful. You are always respectful towards me. You don't order me around or call me names. We have mutual respect.
Whoever that was last night showed zero respect.
______________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Check this out.
Date:
2/4/2007 5:12:16 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
I just got an email from one of the "insiders" who have posted on your blog in the past. People like to think this person is groucho, but it is not. It is the person who often posts about Clay not touring and his contract, etc. They are EXTREMELY nervous about posting anymore information on your blog. Please don't that this as criticism, but as constructive advice. It is imperative that anyone who has this type of information remain anonymous. I think you have concerned a lot of people who've willingly offered inside information and I knew that this would be the result. Sometimes you have to turn the other cheek. I know it's difficult to do. Insiders like, Sue for example, should never be outed. When I tell you that I have recieved 6 emails of concern from "insiders" I am not exaggerating. Don't be upset with me, but I think it was a bad move. Outing Claymates and exposing them is one thing, but Insiders is totally different. But, it's your blog.Best,John
.com wrote:
I understand that you want to protect this person, but this person never should have come and done what they did. I don't know this person. This person came to the blog and got rude when questioned.
When they were asking me to remove their info, they also called me an asshole and there was no thank you.
I don't think you would take kindly to someone interacting with you that way.
Everyone already saw the info last night anyway, and today when I re-read and saw the tone this person took in the e-mail, it pissed me off.
I know you and like you. That's why I will never EVER post one of your e-mails or betray your confidence.
I don't know or like whoever that was last night. I don't owe that person anything.
Happy Superbowl Sunday!
_____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: What
Date:
2/16/2007 11:43:43 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I really hate to disappoint you, but my information about Clay is not coming from his fans. It's coming from those who know him most. You made a truly aweful and terrible assumption and your attacks are unwarranted. I'd tell you how and why I know this to be true, but I would hate that information to be leaked.
.com wrote:
have you let them do to you and why did you let them do it? John, Clay isn't going to change. I am not a Claymate trying to keep you silent. I don't want you to be made a fool.
________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: What
Date:
2/17/2007 12:23:38 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
Again you are wrong. My mother is best friends with Faye's friend. I won't say anything more than that.His humanitarian actions will be genuine and has NOTHING to do with Holleman. There is no correlation between the two.I NEVER said that RCA was dropping Clay. I said the contract was over and not being renewed.I don't support all the Claymates and I think many of them are sick. Not all should be judged as being homophobic or racist.I have nothing against you, it's just there is sooooooooo much I wish I could share and that would so shock you, but I can't and that is why it may seem that I am defending or protecting Clay, but it's just that I know and have known for a year a lot about what is going on in his life. I still love you. lol
.com wrote:
But are his humanitarian efforts going to be genuine or an attempt to save face and help his career and possibly, help him in the Holleman case?
The Claymates are feeding you all kinds of shit. I won't do that. I will tell you that I think you are a very decent man, but I suspect that Clay and people claiming to be insiders and friends of his are trying to screw you and take advantage of your decency.
I have no reason for this e-mail other than because I am concerned for you, Also, for whatever it's worth, *I* did not delete any comment made by you on the 411 blog and as far as I am concerned you are welcome there anytime. It had to be one of the other admns as I wasn't even home at the time. I was out for a belated Valentines Day dinner. Delayed because of ice storms.
As far as being concerned that I would leak anything you might tell me, I believe those fears are unfounded. I have never leaked anything. Even when you gave me insider info that RCA was dropping Clay and nobody else had interest. There was not ONE word about that on the blog.
John, just PLEASE don't believe that Claymates have any affection or concern for you other than just keeping you quiet. You may think that the people at 411 are being harsh with you, but they have supported you. They believe your telling about how things went down between you and Clay. They will be honest with you and not just tell you what you want to hear to serve their own purposes.
It's like the Claymates leaving messages on Quiana and Angie's myspace's everyday. They can't have access to Clay, so they go through people who know him. Do you honestly think that these Claymates have EVER had a friendship with a black person? Especially with a single, black mother? They about crucified Fantasia for being a single, black mother, yet they fawn over Quiana. IMO, they are doing the same thing to you.
You can disregard this e-mail if you wish, but I know I sent it to you with honest, good intentions towards you.
___________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: What
Date:
2/17/2007 8:27:41 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Do you have a phone number you can be reached at?
.com wrote:
John,
I am not going to ask you to share anything, but I want you to know that I love you too, and I do so without an agenda. I just don't want to see you get hurt or used.
Have a good weekend
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: What
Date:
2/17/2007 8:35:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Do you have a number I can call you at. I don't want to write what I will share with you. I can't risk it.
com wrote:
John, I'm glad to hear from you. I want you to know that I just saw the comments that were made about your military service and I edited them because I felt they were way over a line. I value people who serve, my father was a veteran, purple heart winner in WW2 and I remember him sitting with his war buddies talking and their service was the thing outside of their families, that they were most proud of.
Every holiday, everytime it's my dads birthday or my parents anniversary, I visit a Veteran's cemetary and it blows me away everytime, seeing all those who served.
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: What
Date:
2/17/2007 8:39:50 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I understand.
.com wrote:
John, I don't think my family would appreciate me giving my phone number out. No offense to you.
_________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: WHAT are you doing?
Date:
2/18/2007 4:50:27 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
I in no way hinted you are a guy. I don't know who you are? By the way, I asked this person to email me, because I wanted to ask him privately why he had this opinion about Clay. It has NOTHING to do whatsoever with you. I wouldn't defy your trust as I know you wouldn't mine. I want to add that you are really wrong about some of the things you are saying about me on your blog. You are totally off. I wish I could share, but I can't risk it.
.com wrote:
I read this on your blog. WHY are you hinting at my identity? I may not have always agreed with you, but you know damn well that I never betrayed you.
John Paulus said...
Percocet is a guy?
2/18/2007 1:14 PM
John Paulus said...
Charlotte Rae-Can you email me? Jonahcruise@yahoo.com
2/18/2007 1:23 PM
____________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
John, John, John. I suggest YOU follow the #1 rule. ROTFLMAO!! Go ahead and tell whatever you know about me.>
>From: John Paulus> >To: T S>> >Subject: Re: No Subject> >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:52:17 -0800 (PST)> >> >Your animosity toward me. You are taking a very minor thing and blowing >it> >out of proportion. Women!!! I'm so gald I'm gay.> >> >
T S> wrote: WHAT keeps getting worse?> >> >> > >
From: John Paulus> > >To: T S> >> > >Subject: Re: No Subject> > >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:33:34 -0800 (PST)> > >> > >It keeps getting worse.> > >> > >
T S> > wrote: You still have no explanation for what> > >you did on the blog. The girl who> > >told me about your lunch with Clay gave me her phone number. Why would> > >someone making up a story do that. Her IP matched her area code. >John,> > >don't screw around. You know what you did. Own it. You betrayed me.> > >> > >> > > >
From: John Paulus> > > >To: T S> > >> > > >Subject: Re: No Subject> > > >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:19:22 -0800 (PST)> > > >> > > >Name calling? Does it get you angry that someone would brand you a> > > >Claymate or former Claymate? I guess you can imagine how I must have> > >felt.> > > > It's hurtful.> > > >> > > >I can NOT stress enough that you are can believe whatever you choose >to> > > >believe, but I never told ANYONE that I was going to lunch with Clay> > > >EVER!!!> > > >> > > >
T S> > > wrote: I never have been and never will be a> > > >Claymate, nice try at the name-calling> > > >though. Your friend DID confirm in e-mail that you were the source >for> > >her> > > >story and then said she was scared to death because she had to deal> >with> > > >your "wrath" and was angry with ME because YOU forwarded her the mail> > >from> > > >me.> > > >> > > >Don't pretend you are confused about what you did on my blog. You >were> > > >there to try to do harm and you should be a man about it and own up >to> > >it.> > > >There is no way you can say that statement is untrue.> > > >> > > >I don't know what the hell happened to you and why you'd act the way> >you> > > >did> > > >to someone who had always shown you respect. Now you are calling me >a> > > >liar. Well, go for it, bud. There were plenty of people there who> >read> > >it> > > >as it went down and you did yourself no favors.> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >
From: John Paulus> > > > >To: T S> > > >> > > > >Subject: Re: No Subject> > > > >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:05:38 -0800 (PST)> > > > >> > > > >I have to tell you, but I am a little confused. No one has >incurred> >my> > > > >wrath and I never confirmed any story, because THERE WAS NO STORY >TO> > > > >CONFIRM. I did NOT alter your email, but simply forwarded asking> > > >politely> > > > >for a response to it.> > > > >> > > > >As far as being a part of some deceptive scheme orchastrated, again> >you> > > >are> > > > >barking up the wrong tree. It would appear that both you and I are> > >being> > > > >played. Now you can continue to attack and accuse me of things that> >are> > > > >simply not true- that is your perogative. It won't be the first >time> > > >that> > > > >a Claymate or former Claymate has done that.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >
T S> > > > wrote: I am still trying to fathom what the> > > > >hell you tried to do on my blog last> > > > >weekend. I am still very angry about it. You came there with an> > >agenda> > > >to> > > > >seek to disrupt and divide, and you behaved like a man out of his> >mind.> > > > >Ordering me around? Daring me to ban you? Trying to force people >to> > > >take> > > > >sides and then talking shit about ME on YOUR blog after what YOU >did> >on> > > > >mine?> > > > >> > > > >I also think you had a hand in the deception that was attempted> >earlier> > > > >this> > > > >week with the kicknotes and false rumor floating. The person who >was> > > > >e-mailing me confirming your story, I believe on your behalf, told >me> > > >that> > > > >YOU were the source and then was very frightened because she told >me> > >that> > > > >you had forwarded MY email to YOU to HER and she was beside herself> > >that> > > > >she> > > > >had incurred your wrath. Why should this person be so frightened >of> > >you?> > > > >She said she had also lost a good friend. Why do you do this >shit?> > > > >> > > > >Did you alter the "e-mail from me" that you forwarded to her? I put> > > >nothing> > > > >past you anymore. Don't use me in the games that you play. I used >to> > > >trust> > > > >you and I always kept your confidence til you destroyed my trust >with> > > >that> > > > >stunt you pulled last weekend.> > > > >> > > > >By the way...the numbers have been no different since you've been> > >banned.> > > > >> > > > >WHAT were you THINKING? For a person who "claims" to have moved >on,> > >you> > > > >certainly are involved in anything you can be regarding Clay Aiken.
_________________________________________________________________
From: John Paulus> >To: T S>> >Subject: Re: No Subject> >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:58:05 -0800 (PST)> >> >Do you have to use that language? I really dislike reading those foul> >words in my email. It reminds me of the language this crazy teacher from> >Nebraska used all the time. You wouldn't happen to be a teacher also?> >> >
T S> wrote: Heck I mentioned the possibility you> >may have at one time been a> >Claymate and you had a fit.> >> >Please show me where I had that fit?> >> >You, my dear, have betrayed.> >> >Did I talk shit about you on my blog after your little psycho show, yep I> >did. How did *I* betray?> >> >You are mistaken if you think you can fuck with me. I was never a fan of> >yours, but I did respect you. You may be able to manipulate your fans, >but> >it won't work here.> >> >> >> >> >> > >
From: John Paulus> > >To: T S> >> > >Subject: Re: No Subject> > >Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:33:12 -0800 (PST)> > >> > >Betrayed you? PLEASE!!! Give it a break. As far as what I did on your> > >blog? I'm still aloof. I was attacked repeatedly and called a >Claymate> > >over and over again. Heck I mentioned the possibility you may have at >one> > >time been a Claymate and you had a fit.> > >> > >Again, she did NOT hear from me that I was having lunch with Clay. I >can> > >NOT emphasize that fact enough. I have absolutely no DOUBT that >someone> > >miscontrued or took something as fact and ran with it. I AM NOT> >responsible> > >for that.> > >> > >Again, you need to get off of this I betrayed you kick. Betrayed you >how?> > >You, my dear, have betrayed.
All of John Paulus's Email's To Me Month of January
John appears to be needing some time to concoct a story to explain away his lies. Most liars have VERY active imaginations, so I'm sure he'll come up with something good, yet unbelievable. I am going to post all the e-mails that I have saved that John sent to me regarding Clay Aiken.
I will be happy to forward these e-mails to anyone who may question their authenticity. Again, JP's words in red, mine in blue. Here is what I have. In order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/27/2007 11:13:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I don't want to post this myself, but back in November Clay changed his Valleyprettyboy screen name to HappyChappy2. Anyway last week he contacted 3 people on Manhunt. One is a guy that I know who lives in Cary. Clay and he webcammed and Clay wanted the guy to Top him. Seems like Clay wants to bottom now. Well this guy wasn't into Clay and told him he wasn't interested so Clay turned off the webcam and moved on to the next guy who obviously gave the information to Perez. Clay won't answer my IM's, emails, or text messages to him. Please don't share that he keeps in contact with me.
.com wrote:
Hope all is well with you. What's up?
AS you can see, John sought me out for this e-mail, I did not seek him out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/27/2007 11:20:15 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
I just don't want anyone to suspect that I told you. Oh, and the reason I asked about the GMA thing is because he told me he would be doing an interview in February and that I would be very happy. He wouldn't elaborate anymore on it.
.com wrote:
John,
I will always keep any confidence that you ask me to. Clay is unbelievable. I hope he ends up getting the help he needs and I hope he learns some lessons in humility.
Is it ok to share that he has been webcamming quite a bit or would you like me to keep that confidential as well?
Take Care!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/27/2007 11:32:11 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
Yes, you can mention it tomorrow. Clay has been on manhunt quite a bit. I know during his Christmas tour that he tried to hook up with a guy in Maryland through Manhunt. When I asked him about it he denied it. He said that someone was pretending to be him and that he was "having his people look into it". I knew it was a lie. Clay's a habitual liar and will never change. He lies about a lot of things.I know some of his friends contacted me today and told me they were tired of defending him and I even had some crazy Claymates email me and apologized. I think there is no way for them to spin this one. He's done himself in.
.com wrote:
I definitely will never mention that he is in contact with you, but is it ok with you if I mention about the manhunting he's been doing...maybe tomorrow so people don't think it came directly from you?
His GMA appearance was announced on Jan. 24th and the OFC had in parentheses that it was UNICEF.
If his fans saw a GMA appearance, they'd probably want to know why and maybe the UNICEF thing was floated out there to quell any speculation on the part of the fans about a tour, or anything else.
Also, the Kimmel appearance on Valentines day...they are screening out the Claymates. Apparently, they do not want Claymates to be making up the audience like they usually do. I found that interesting. Maybe they don't want Claymates in the audience if Clay is going to be coming out before then.
What do you think?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/27/2007 11:44:37 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
Well, Clay is refusing to answer me today. I wanted to hear him explain this one. lol
.com wrote:
I agree. I don't see how he get's out of this one. The arrogance! If he was thinking, he would have at least taken off his rings! I really get the impression he believes he is untouchable.
The Kimmel show screening out the Claymates is really interesting. There is a profile that needs to be filled out when requesting tickets, and none of the Claymates have been confirmed. One of them had their son apply for tickets using his info and his tickets were confirmed right away, but that's probably because they saw it was a young male requesting tickets and then they ask for ID when you get there to pick them up.
The Claymates are frustrated and upset about this, but I think it would stand to reason, that if Clay comes out before doing Kimmel, he won't want an audience filled with angry Claymates!
Keep me posted and I'll keep you posted.
I'm glad people who doubted you are coming around and apologizing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/28/2007 5:28:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
You just caught me sitting at the computer. I've been away ALL DAY. lolHere's what you can share. Clay changed his screen name from ValleyPrettyBoy to HappyChappy2 back in November on Manhunt.net. He put in the request through customer service and they changed it for him so that is why he was able to use the same format. Clay DID hook up with a guy last week in Raleigh and has been cruising on Manhunt.net for area men since the end of his Christmas Tour. Clay did try unsuccessfully to pick up a guy in Maryland during his tour and thus the blind item that ran. I believe it was Maryland, maybe it was Pennsylvania. Anyway, he also tried to pick up another guy in Cary on Thursday. Clay webcammed with this guy and wanted the guy to top him. The guys profile has him as a 30 year old Top in Cary. Please don't share that you got this information from me.
.com wrote:
Have you been able to find anything else out regarding the Perez Hilton story?
Hope you are enjoying your Sunday.
Ok. That time I sought JOHN out.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/28/2007 5:57:27 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Well, I'm chatting with Clay now. He's really embarrassed.
.com wrote:
John, I will never say that I got this information from you. I have been posting on the blog that anyone with info can e-mail me with the info and it will be kept confidential, so people can think I'm getting this from responses to what I've posted.
I'm a bit surprised that TMZ and other outlets haven't picked this up yet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Hi John
Date:
1/29/2007 5:25:20 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Believe it or not, but the idiot was trolling the internet again last night and tried to pick up a guy that I know from Manhunt. A guy that I went out on a date with over the Summer if you recall. Clay is just out of control. I know that he told some of his friends that he can't believe that people would believe anything that Perez wrote. His friends are more convinced that he's a habitual liar.As far as my chat went... well, he chatted very little with me especially when I called him on some of his comments (lies).Best,John
.com wrote:
How did your chat with Clay go? Did you find anything out about how this is going to get
handled?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: John
Date:
1/29/2007 8:25:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
.com wrote:
Someone claiming to know Clay is on the 411 blog basically calling your story bullshit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: John
Date:
1/29/2007 8:42:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
.com wrote:
I believe that this person is full of shit. That's why I wanted you to be able to call them on it, if you felt like it.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: John
Date:
1/29/2007 9:04:47 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
No, I am glad that you told me. My first instict was to think it was Clay who posted those remarks. I know I get slammed for being nice to him on your blog, but there is a reason. While I do believe what I write, I defend him in order to build his trust in me so that he will tell me more. It is true that he is lonely and really is looking for someone special. He has told me this. That is why I think that poster was him.
com wrote:
John,
I hope I didn't bother you by alerting you to what was going on with the blog. I know you are distancing yourself from this shit as much as you can. When I saw whoever that dipshit is calling your credibility into question, by first instinct was to alert you. I hope I didn't introduce aggravation into your day.
You have always been kind to me, honest with me and I think you are a very decent and good man.
I didn't like seeing you be bashed.
If you don't want me to bother you with blog bullshit like that anymore, just let me know.
Hang in there!
Hope your day is good!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: John
Date:
1/29/2007 9:17:32 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I am telling you that he is a pathelogical liar. And he is very miserable to be around. The only reason why he has friends "butt kissers" is because he's famous and they want something from him. He's an addict and he won't stop trolling for sex.I love that he still has he manhunt account and despite his screenname being revealed he's not changing it. It's like a giant FU to the fans. They are just too dumb to see it.
.com wrote:
I totally understand your reasons, John. He's not going to talk to you if he considers you hostile to him. I've had a feeling that's what's been happening. I know you have a good head on your shoulders and are very comfortable being exactly who you are. You are also smart. You're going to keep him talking.
Given his downright FOUL personality, I really don't think he's going to find someone special who will put up with him unless he makes some changes. When someone is lonely, there is often a reason. He sounds like a miserable person to be around.
I'm glad you two never developed a romantic relationship. He doesn't deserve a man of your sensitivity and he would hurt you time and time again.
Thought you might like to know.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: John
Date:
1/29/2007 10:07:25 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Can you send me those IM conversation and any other that might be sent. I can't always read your blog. Please keep me informed. I am pissed off.
com wrote:
I CAN''T believe that ugly little fuck is LYING about you. What a scumbag!
So you do think NAA is legit? I've been very hard on him because I felt he was bashing you and lying. Now it looks like Clay was lying to HIM. (NAA)
I can't believe the nerve of Clay. What a rotten person.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: The convos.
Date:
1/29/2007 10:13:02 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Don't say anything, but I just contacted Perez with the new webcam photos and he has it up on his blog. Clay wants to play hardball, well it's on!!! I have lots of connections.
.com wrote:
I am attaching the pictures I saved of the convo's NAA posted. And the web-cam shot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: The convos.
Date:
1/29/2007 10:36:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I think NAA was a Claymate. As soon as I said that I wanted those IM's he/she IMed me immediately. Saying please don't send them to Clay and then when he/she saw that Perez posted the webcam photo's she went ballistic on me. I think it was one of Clay's "friends" with Clay trying to manipulate again.
.com wrote:
GOOD! I'm GLAD you sent his ugly ass picture to Perez! I won't say a word to anyone. Little Mr. Unicef makes me SICK! If NAA comes back, I'll save anything they post and send it to you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: The convos.
Date:
1/29/2007 10:56:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I agree. He's back on Manhunt again right now. He.just.doesn't.care!!!
.com wrote:
In a message dated 1/29/2007 10:36:38 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jonahcruise@yahoo.com writes:
I think NAA was a Claymate. As soon as I said that I wanted those IM's he/she IMed me immediately. Saying please don't send them to Clay and then when he/she saw that Perez posted the webcam photo's she went ballistic on me. I think it was one of Clay's "friends" with Clay trying to manipulate again.
What idiots! He SOOO pisses me off with his fraudulent ways and his blatant manipulation of EVERYONE. Humanitarian MY ASS! He doesn't do ANYTHING that won't somehow benefit himself. Clay is getting to the point where he'll talk to ANYONE and it's gonna come back to bite him every time! He should shut up and get help!
____________________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: The convos.
Date:
1/29/2007 11:09:56 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I believe that is the case.
.com wrote:
In a message dated 1/29/2007 10:56:44 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, jonahcruise@yahoo.com writes:
I agree. He's back on Manhunt again right now. He.just.doesn't.care!!!
I think he's reaching a point where he's not going to be able to pick up ANYONE considering how notorious he has become. His own worst enemy. And too stupid to try to change. What happened to his boyfriend? Did he dump Clay because Clay was cheating?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject:
Re: Claymate hoax?
Date:
1/30/2007 8:14:53 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Hi there.Funny that you should email me about this. Clay promises that he did not write that. I tend to believe him based on the panic response I got from NAA when I said I was going to confront Clay with them.John
com wrote:
John, I think we all might have been set up last night by a Claymate. If you read the blogs, you will see how things unfolded. This person has been banned and I don't know if the object was to discredit your story, as many people at the blog seem to think, or to try to set the blog up as a source for lies. Thankfully, it seems to have backfired on them when Perez picked up the picture.
I still don't understand how a Claymate got that story from Clay or the webcam pictures. It makes me wonder if Clay or friends of Clay were involved.
Just wanted to let you know what's up. Hope your day was good.
____________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Claymate hoax?
Date:
1/30/2007 8:16:42 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
.com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Please don't share that I communicate with Clay.
_______________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Claymate hoax?
Date:
1/30/2007 8:41:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Clay is REALLY lonely. This is killing him living this double life. He won't tell me why he won't come out. He just says, "I can't. Not now, at least".
com wrote:
John, I've never betrayed your confidence before and I promise you that I never will in the future. My word is good, as I know your's is as well. I believe you are a very honest, decent and kind man. You have no worries with me.
All the best to you.
___________________________________________________________
Subject:
Re: Claymate hoax?
Date:
1/30/2007 9:09:29 P.M. Eastern Standard Time
From:
jonahcruise@yahoo.com
Reply To:
To:
com
CC:
BCC:
Sent on:
Sent from the Internet (Details)
I'm beginning to question whether or not it's the label.
.com wrote:
He should really just come out. It's bad for him to live the way he's been living. Whoever is holding him back, IMO, doesn't have his best interests at heart.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)